3DSPlaza forums - [Revised] Forum Rules

Back to forum: This Plaza

Search forums via Google

2 Users appreciate this thread.

[Revised] Forum Rules
<< <

Started by DrakeJericho
(2015-03-11 15:22:26)

carlos11 (2015-05-07 11:52:24)

Trust me.

Language is a tool for efficient communication. The internet is a tool for fast communication. Do not defy both intents by posting incoherent writing.

carlos11 (2015-05-14 00:29:12)

Because it is against the rules, silly. Can't you read?

Language is a tool for efficient communication. The internet is a tool for fast communication. Do not defy both intents by posting incoherent writing.

JaronTheFireCat (2015-05-14 04:04:28)

^ OOOOOH

[img]http://wowmeter.ml/$JaronMC[/img]

carlos11 (2015-05-19 03:14:01)

That doesn't make sense, Leake.

Language is a tool for efficient communication. The internet is a tool for fast communication. Do not defy both intents by posting incoherent writing.

carlos11 (2015-05-19 05:26:48)

That doesn't make sense either.

Language is a tool for efficient communication. The internet is a tool for fast communication. Do not defy both intents by posting incoherent writing.

Lani (2015-05-19 15:31:26)

If I thought that image fell under the definition of NSFW, I would have removed it. The reason it doesn't, in my opinion, is because unlike the anthro there's no human anatomy to her. She's not covering anything that shouldn't be seen, because it's not implied that she's anatomically human.

You seem to have missed the part when I said just because someone may be aroused by an image doesn't automatically make it NSFW....anyone can be aroused by anything, technically speaking....and it's not exactly usual for people to be turned on by an animal, unless there's human anatomy or sexual actions involved.

Also, that's not my definition of porn...it's the legal definition.

I'll run the whole "SFP" thing by SL and see what he says, though. I can understand how you think the anthro was appropriate, (though you have to admit it was borderline, no?) so I'll see if we can get a more "official" standard.

This post has been edited one or more times, the last time was:
2015-05-19 15:38:57

Lani (2015-05-19 18:52:57)

After speaking with both SL and Rob (through Skype), they have both identified anthro Rarity image (and to my surprise, even the recently posted image of Fluttershy in the Cute/Hot Pony thread) as NSFW. After showing SL the above picture of Rarity in the hot spring, he didn't identify this as NSFW (though I didn't show it to Rob ). After asking for an official clarification of what to consider NSFW, I was merely told by Rob to do what I think is right, and SL had no opinion.

So, this pretty much brings us back to where we started. NSFW is within the opinion of whomever has the authority to moderate it. If a moderator deems something as inappropriate, or in this case NSFW, please respect that decision whether you agree or not. It's not as though you're getting banned for it, we're only removing the inappropriate content from your posts, and nothing else....I think we can all live with that, no?

I'm not a control freak who just wants to ruin someone's day by removing their posts and all their fun....I only remove posts when I believe--in my opinion--that it's violating the rules, despite by whom or why it's posted. I wouldn't slack on any other rules just because other people don't agree with my judgement.

This post has been edited one or more times, the last time was:
2015-05-19 19:21:27

BirdJesus (2015-05-20 03:17:18)

For once, I agree with David.

"Ugh, I need to go masturbate now. Whenever I get mad or worried, that's what I do."
-mega, the homosexual animal rapist.

carlos11 (2015-05-20 03:48:46)

That's the extreme conservative stance on the matter.

Language is a tool for efficient communication. The internet is a tool for fast communication. Do not defy both intents by posting incoherent writing.